Here's the full story:
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20071108/tuk-school-stripper-shocks-birthday-boy-6323e80_1.html
A few things are wrong with this story. And yet it feels soooo right! I mean, for one, the mum must be barking mad. She booked a STRIPPER for her 16 YEAR OLD, and had her go to his SCHOOL!
The other thing I've noticed is this:
"To the soundtrack of Britney Spears, she then spanked him 16 times - once for each year - before stripping down to her bra and knickers. It was only when she asked the schoolboy to rub cream on her that the shocked teacher called a halt to the show."
WTF!? So its ok to have a stripper in school, spanking the poor boy (okay, maybe not "poor" boy!) and for her to strip down to her undies.
But to rub cream on her is too much, so the teacher stepped in! You mean to tell me that the teacher let everything happen up to the "creaming"!?
Ofsted will love this...
I saw a blog about not being allowed to touch a child even to apply a plaster according to, it suggested, regulations but recently a smack within reason has been decided lawful, so perhaps, having plenty of reason to allow the spanking the teacher, wanting to live by the spirit of the law and not just the letter, had to call a halt when it came to the application of a cream!